Subject	question as to why he went with a lower comp. (n/m)
Posted by	SkiFly01 on December 15, 2011 at 2:44 PM
	This message has been viewed 102 times.
In Reply To	ok, Was this a question or you repeating what I posted? (n/m) posted by toykoz32 on December 14, 2011 at 05:46 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Custom Brackets for Idlers - toykoz32 20:25:04 12/13/11 Id wager the reason they break is because of improper torque - ZiNnYc 21:38:51 12/13/11 Thats what I said ( the waste part ), but how would the - toykoz32 21:53:35 12/13/11 Just wondering out loud...double the vibration it would - ZiNnYc 22:07:23 12/13/11 I doubt there would be added vibration - toykoz32 22:18:12 12/13/11 whats the problem with the non harmonic dampener? (n/m) - toykoz32 22:29:18 12/13/11 Harmonics (n/m) - Xteam300TT (South Tx ) 22:35:00 12/13/11 I wanted to see his answer, I friend just had - toykoz32 22:47:24 12/13/11 Dont see why it wouldnt help . He'll have peace of mind ! (n/m) - Xteam300TT (South Tx ) 22:38:34 12/13/11 I like this solution much better than the Ramey stud - black300zx 22:41:27 12/13/11 Hey! I know that engine ;) (n/m) - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 01:43:29 12/14/11 Looks like a UR crank pulley... - ChaseGrayTT 07:09:41 12/14/11 It's a neat little idea, but I think the best way - LitlElvis 11:27:32 12/14/11 99% improper setting of hydraulic tensioner. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 16:04:23 12/14/11 This is just insurance. - toykoz32 17:45:35 12/14/11 So he build an NA motor with 10:1 comp, OEM is 10.5:1 (n/m) - SkiFly01 14:01:21 12/14/11 ok, Was this a question or you repeating what I posted? (n/m) - toykoz32 17:46:26 12/14/11 question as to why he went with a lower comp. (n/m) - SkiFly01 14:44:52 12/15/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.